it's just a fact that vampires, especially vampires like Katherine and Damon, are unlikely to tolerate her behavior for long.
And why on earth should that be a fact? Why should the writers allow that? Why should the writers make the deliberate choice - have the deliberate preference - to murder her because the villains don't like her? You could just as easily have them express their impatience and be thwarted. No, the writers think it's perfectly okay and a natural extension to have 'she's a teenager, and her rapist doesn't like it, so obviously she's going to die.' Never mind spouting extremely gendered and problematic stereotypes as - not even justification, because Julie 'proud of the fact that she fridged Anna' Plec doesn't see anything to justify.
Never mind the fact that Caroline has not been particularly immature or teenager-like in her most recent interactions with Damon; she's been behaving in a perfectly justified manner. So basically what Damon is 'not going to put up with' is his abused victim having the power to fight back.
no subject
And why on earth should that be a fact? Why should the writers allow that? Why should the writers make the deliberate choice - have the deliberate preference - to murder her because the villains don't like her? You could just as easily have them express their impatience and be thwarted. No, the writers think it's perfectly okay and a natural extension to have 'she's a teenager, and her rapist doesn't like it, so obviously she's going to die.' Never mind spouting extremely gendered and problematic stereotypes as - not even justification, because Julie 'proud of the fact that she fridged Anna' Plec doesn't see anything to justify.
Never mind the fact that Caroline has not been particularly immature or teenager-like in her most recent interactions with Damon; she's been behaving in a perfectly justified manner. So basically what Damon is 'not going to put up with' is his abused victim having the power to fight back.