http://qualapec.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] qualapec.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] redbrunja 2013-03-09 09:27 pm (UTC)

Actually, Sif/Loki having an element of safety to it makes total sense to me - it's one of the reasons I ship Sif/Loki and not Darcy/Loki is because Loki could have a temper tantrum and kill Darcy - Loki could probably kill Sif, but he'd have to work damn hard to do so, and I buy that Sif is enough of a statigist and knows Loki well enough that most of his favorite tricks wouldn't work on her

All of this. Plus, I think in a lot of situations, Loki's background with Sif means he's less likely to threaten her because he knows that she knows. Even at that, it's a delicate dance between keeping him IC and not crossing a line.

it also reminds me of when I was talking about my list of favorite male character and how all of those men are people I would feel safe with

Even Tony Stark?

That's really fascinating though. I have a lot of favorite male characters that are objectively unsafe people to be around, even though I'm fairly sensitive to in-story dynamics.

On that subject, you are not the only friend of mine who's a fan of mad scientist characters, and I think that element of chaos and unpredictability is part of why I don't fall for crazy mad scientist characters

That is 100% legitimate. With me, I sort of take it as a challenge to explain the method behind the madness. Like, if I can't see why that character is behaving in that way or what fuels their actions, I'm less likely to enjoy them.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting