February 2023

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Monday, December 28th, 2009 02:57 pm
 After the failed Northwest Airlines bombing, the TSA tightened up its regulations, requiring that all flights in the US and coming to the US had every passenger patted down prior to boarding and carry only one item onboard, which will be searched by hand prior to boarding. Additionally, during the last hour of the flight, passengers are not allowed to leave their seats, access their luggage, or use handheld electronics, and must sit with their hands in plain view.

What this tells me is that the TSA is fairly clueless on how to keep travelers safe.

I am all for bumping up safety when attacks or threats happen; but the epic delays and cancellations that occurred when these new restrictions came into effect leads me to infer that the TSA does not have the infrastructure to deal with threats, which is ridiculous when you realize they have had nine years since September 11th.

And as for keeping your hands in sight and not using electronics during the last hour – frankly, that is treating people like criminals. I have a very emotional reaction to this; all I can think about is that after paying for an expensive ticket, taking an abnormal amount of time to prove that you are a.) who you say you are and b.) safe to have on a plane, you are treated like a prisoner being transported from one jail to another.

Furthermore, all it seems to do is show that the TSA safety procedures do not work. Or the TSA doesn't have faith that they do, if they think that after going through three different screening processes, they still believe there is a reasonable probability that passengers are carrying hazardous materials.

Finally, I have a huge problem with how mum the TSA is being about why they tightened restrictions and even WHAT the tightened restrictions are. One of the callers on NPR today flew in from Charles de Galle and commented that if he hadn't been a journalist and had access to the wires, he wouldn't have know what was going on.
Wednesday, December 30th, 2009 01:17 am (UTC)
UNACCEPTABLE! SO FUCKING UNACCEPTABLE!

Sweet jesus.

Especially as I was not permitted to reach for my medication.

I'm pretty sure that is actually ILLEGAL. Motherfuckers.
Wednesday, December 30th, 2009 01:57 am (UTC)
The idiot couldn't tell the difference between a snapblade and a lockblade knife (basic def: One can be flicked open, the other takes some concentration to get the mechanism to release the blade).

The cop was not very nice, either, until the point at which the line of questioning revealed my mind was in the same place as it was during exam panic where I blanked on 'Name', and she finally thought to ask if I was on any medication while I attempted to keep the hyperventilation controlled.

Ha ha! You think legality matters to airport security? When you cross the border to the US with a laptop, they can copy your entire hard drive just to check and see if you've got anything on there that might be terrorist-related. A guy my brother knows works for an Australian company that had this contract with the US government, and were charged 400k for letting confidential files be copied. By the US government.
Tuesday, January 5th, 2010 04:00 pm (UTC)
*headdesk*

God, that is so... well, it's terribly believable, but it's just another blazing sign that things need to change greatly.