Oh my god, you guys, I just realized how the writers of Once could have keep the entire story basically the same BUT removed the skeevy adoption metaphor:
imagine that when Henry had first showed up at Emma's door,
it had been to break the curse on Storybrooke.... including the one on his mother, who'd been cursed to be the evil queen.
Right? Right? Isn't that the greatest idea ever? Because then Henry could still be working against Regina (because she's still the evil queen) and Regina could be working against Emma (because who is this woman who shows up out of nowhere to try and take her kid away?) and Regina could still have the same arc in FTL (what agency she has intact) (because Henry is too young to understand nuance and emotional manipulation and control).
imagine that when Henry had first showed up at Emma's door,
it had been to break the curse on Storybrooke.... including the one on his mother, who'd been cursed to be the evil queen.
Right? Right? Isn't that the greatest idea ever? Because then Henry could still be working against Regina (because she's still the evil queen) and Regina could be working against Emma (because who is this woman who shows up out of nowhere to try and take her kid away?) and Regina could still have the same arc in FTL (what agency she has intact) (because Henry is too young to understand nuance and emotional manipulation and control).
no subject
no subject
It really does! You're absolutely right that it's very common for children who were FAR more abused than Henry (who I would argue wasn't) to still love and want to protect their parents - Henry's behavior doesn't make much emotional sense.