After the failed Northwest Airlines bombing, the TSA tightened up its regulations, requiring that all flights in the US and coming to the US had every passenger patted down prior to boarding and carry only one item onboard, which will be searched by hand prior to boarding. Additionally, during the last hour of the flight, passengers are not allowed to leave their seats, access their luggage, or use handheld electronics, and must sit with their hands in plain view.
What this tells me is that the TSA is fairly clueless on how to keep travelers safe.
I am all for bumping up safety when attacks or threats happen; but the epic delays and cancellations that occurred when these new restrictions came into effect leads me to infer that the TSA does not have the infrastructure to deal with threats, which is ridiculous when you realize they have had nine years since September 11th.
And as for keeping your hands in sight and not using electronics during the last hour – frankly, that is treating people like criminals. I have a very emotional reaction to this; all I can think about is that after paying for an expensive ticket, taking an abnormal amount of time to prove that you are a.) who you say you are and b.) safe to have on a plane, you are treated like a prisoner being transported from one jail to another.
Furthermore, all it seems to do is show that the TSA safety procedures do not work. Or the TSA doesn't have faith that they do, if they think that after going through three different screening processes, they still believe there is a reasonable probability that passengers are carrying hazardous materials.
Finally, I have a huge problem with how mum the TSA is being about why they tightened restrictions and even WHAT the tightened restrictions are. One of the callers on NPR today flew in from Charles de Galle and commented that if he hadn't been a journalist and had access to the wires, he wouldn't have know what was going on.
What this tells me is that the TSA is fairly clueless on how to keep travelers safe.
I am all for bumping up safety when attacks or threats happen; but the epic delays and cancellations that occurred when these new restrictions came into effect leads me to infer that the TSA does not have the infrastructure to deal with threats, which is ridiculous when you realize they have had nine years since September 11th.
And as for keeping your hands in sight and not using electronics during the last hour – frankly, that is treating people like criminals. I have a very emotional reaction to this; all I can think about is that after paying for an expensive ticket, taking an abnormal amount of time to prove that you are a.) who you say you are and b.) safe to have on a plane, you are treated like a prisoner being transported from one jail to another.
Furthermore, all it seems to do is show that the TSA safety procedures do not work. Or the TSA doesn't have faith that they do, if they think that after going through three different screening processes, they still believe there is a reasonable probability that passengers are carrying hazardous materials.
Finally, I have a huge problem with how mum the TSA is being about why they tightened restrictions and even WHAT the tightened restrictions are. One of the callers on NPR today flew in from Charles de Galle and commented that if he hadn't been a journalist and had access to the wires, he wouldn't have know what was going on.
no subject
. . . what happens if someone needs to use the bathroom during the hands-where-we-can-see period? Do they just have to hold it in? What if they have bladder problems? Do the airlines want to just let 'em soak the seats?
no subject
or the guy who was deemed a terrorist for spending too long in the bathroom, when he was actually just very sick after eating the airport food.
Sweet Jesus.
. . . what happens if someone needs to use the bathroom during the hands-where-we-can-see period? Do they just have to hold it in? What if they have bladder problems? Do the airlines want to just let 'em soak the seats?
Exactly my question. And since the TSA was barely talking about what measure were talking, they certainly weren't providing any answers.
no subject
Actually, I can see Crowley being behind the airport regulations. That's the same kind of style as you see from a guy who takes down a cell phone network for an afternoon to sow the seeds of evil in everyone.
no subject
no subject
no subject
They tore open my checked bag and pulled everything out because I'd packed a)a pair of metal toy handcuffs (they didn't actually lock) for a cosplay idea I later abandoned and b)some nice knives I'd picked up at the con (I collect 'em). I had to stand in the middle of the security area, unable to so much as approach my suitcase to tuck away the underwear, and wait for half an hour for the cops to arrive and tell the idiot that they were toy cuffs and that the knives were not actually illegal.
My various issues include social anxiety, and this did not help my condition one iota. Especially as I was not permitted to reach for my medication.
no subject
Sweet jesus.
Especially as I was not permitted to reach for my medication.
I'm pretty sure that is actually ILLEGAL. Motherfuckers.
no subject
The cop was not very nice, either, until the point at which the line of questioning revealed my mind was in the same place as it was during exam panic where I blanked on 'Name', and she finally thought to ask if I was on any medication while I attempted to keep the hyperventilation controlled.
Ha ha! You think legality matters to airport security? When you cross the border to the US with a laptop, they can copy your entire hard drive just to check and see if you've got anything on there that might be terrorist-related. A guy my brother knows works for an Australian company that had this contract with the US government, and were charged 400k for letting confidential files be copied. By the US government.
no subject
God, that is so... well, it's terribly believable, but it's just another blazing sign that things need to change greatly.