Okay, I had a whole long post regarding all my problems with this book but then livejournal ate it. And I just do not have the patience to type it all up again. Basically, it was boring,
Pierce let all her darlings not only live but frolic, she only wrote about slavery so she could have a happy ending (instead of writing about the cult of the Gentle Mother, which is what we're all invested in, despite knowing it ends badly until Alanna and Kel come to kick Tortall back into shape), while the romantic lead is awesome, the romance is rushed, JUST KILL THE FUCKING DOG, etc, etc.
Pierce let all her darlings not only live but frolic, she only wrote about slavery so she could have a happy ending (instead of writing about the cult of the Gentle Mother, which is what we're all invested in, despite knowing it ends badly until Alanna and Kel come to kick Tortall back into shape), while the romantic lead is awesome, the romance is rushed, JUST KILL THE FUCKING DOG, etc, etc.
Tags:
no subject
Seriously, it makes me want to write a dog into a story just to kill it.
Fucking dogs.
no subject
And it was kinda supposed to be a happy book, I think. Pierce kind of coddled them the whole way through. I think that if she could have avoided killing Tunstall, she would have.
But animals dying in books really, deeply disturbs me; and I hate it when they kill the dog. I don't think it was a good call to kill the children, either. I'm biased, but I also think killing characters that can't defend themselves is pointless and cheap in a book like this.
I see where you're coming from from a writing standpoint, but from the part of me that says animals are not things will always be okay with Pierce's choice.
no subject
See, I feel like killing Tunstall was another example of her making life easy on the writers. Nobody had to go through a public trial and execution with Tunstall, etc.
But animals dying in books really, deeply disturbs me; and I hate it when they kill the dog. I don't think it was a good call to kill the children, either. I'm biased, but I also think killing characters that can't defend themselves is pointless and cheap in a book like this.
I believe that not killing character who would logically die (children or animals or what-have-you) and having characters die when it's easiest is weak writing and makes me frustrated with the book and the writer as a whole.
no subject
True. I do wish she'd gone ahead and owned that decision.
Also, I think this book put a lot of effort towards making death less scary in Tortallverse...which I'm kinda sure might be a prelude to her doing some serious cataclysmic shit when she writes about it again, so we'll see.
I believe that not killing character who would logically die (children or animals or what-have-you) and having characters die when it's easiest is weak writing and makes me frustrated with the book and the writer as a whole.
That's fair enough for adult fiction, but I also think it's important to look at the audience you're writing for and the current climate. A strong theme in Pierce's books has always been "animals have feelings and need to be taken care of", which in some sense is more important to me than technically perfect writing.
To be fair, Pounce certainly made Beka's life easier than Achoo. If you're going to talk about killing one of her pets, I'd almost think it would be the magic one.
no subject
I can see your point. However, if Pierce wasn't going to kill Achoo, I wish she'd made it less obvious, and not have the dog almost die to be magically saved.
no subject
And it was definitely not one of her best written works, I'm not arguing that point at all. I did feel like there was too much fat and not enough meat. The book felt drawn out even though the plot was rushed, if that makes any sense?
I still enjoyed it, even if I can't put my finger on why, but it was lacking on plot and development. And Rosto and Aniki and Kora doing something seriously epic, which I was sort of looking forward to.