If you tagged your fic 'Steve/Darcy' AND 'pre-slash' I can fucking guarantee, you are DOING SOMETHING TERRIBLY WRONG.
(Do not even get me started on my hatred of the tag 'pre-slash.')
(Do not even get me started on my hatred of the tag 'pre-slash.')
Tags:
no subject
All right, now I don't use 'pre-slash', since it seems just as easy to use the ship name or tag it 'slash', but why does 'pre-slash' get your ire up? Isn't it like saying "Eventual such-and-such"?
no subject
It bugs me because I feel like it's a disengenous attempt to get both slash and gen fans to read a fic - only if they click, the slash fans will likely end up disappointed and the gen fans (if they're like me and really don't like slash) will be braced for the two dudes to start kissing. Which they sometimes do and sometimes don't.
In reality, I actually think 'pre-slash turns more readers away than draws them in, but that could be my bias.
If there is no kissing, no sex, no romantic thoughts, just label your fic gen. If you're building to a relationship or there are romantic thoughts or the beginnings of romantic thoughts, be honest and label it slash.
no subject
I see what you mean, it's like rolling the dice every time.
I do sympathize with not knowing what to tag the first chapter of a multichapter story that is eventually going to have a pairing but doesn't yet. Because I know it's going to happen, and I want people to know it's going to happen, but I'm worried about people clicking and being disappointed that it hasn't happened yet and that that tag is somehow disingenuous for that chapter.
no subject
As a reader (and I feel most readers in general) and smart enough to know that if a fic is tagged as character A/character B and it's a multi-chapter, they're going to automatically understand that even though the two character might not be together in the beginning, CLEARLY the fic is going to be about (or have a subplot about) them hooking up. I mean, that's just how stories work.
no subject
no subject
I have read het sex like that - that was so boring and by the numbers that I skipped it (in romance novels, as well as fanfic, which is just like...come on, published authors, up your game.)
i don't actually know what the point of my ramble was, tbh, but we can both agree that there should be more great steve/darcy on ao3, y/y?
Fuck yes. I'm trying to find some Steve/Darcy is not wildly ooc that I haven't read before and it's.... pretty damn impossible, atm.
no subject
Also, because I'm curious, which stereotypes have you noticed that come from the fandom and not the character?
no subject
Oh, fuck yes. It's gotten to the point where I really pay attention to how an author will write Steve and tech and it's like - he's clearly, in the movie, functioning with things like tablets and very advanted comms - he's not going to fumble around and act shocked by everything.
people forget that bruce and tony are two characters who are written to be as uncommonly smart as ~people wish they could be~, it's a different shade of the comic book power fantasy. steve is a different kind of intelligent, that doesn't mean he needs help tying his shoes.
*nods*
Compared to Tony and Bruce, just about EVERYONE (except Jane and Selvig and Betty) are idiots regarding one specific type of intelligence. (I also find it pretty funny that in the movie, Steve ended up finding basically the same information that Tony was hacking SHIELD for, and if you factor in when they each started looking, Steve found it faster.)
no subject
And obviously queer women can do fetishizing messy stuff too. But we're not even a small minority of slashers; we're a heavy proportion, and I genuinely think it's become kind of erasing to emphasise this "slashers with straight privilege" thing.
Idk. I don't massively disagree but I just think "undeniable" is way too certain of a term when there are so many people for whom slash is not about that at all
no subject
Huh, that is really interesting, because that is completely different than the other percentages that I've seen quoted before.
Idk. I don't massively disagree but I just think "undeniable" is way too certain of a term when there are so many people for whom slash is not about that at all
Yeah, probably a bad word choice.
no subject
What a fucking exercise in frustration.
Though, I'd be weirdly more okay if I saw ONE. GOD. DAMNED. STORY. that was Pepper/Someone, Tony/Pepper rather than Tony/Whoever, Tony/Pepper.
But no.
The thing that's hysterically funny? In comics, Pepper blows Tony off and he spends most of his time pining over her. *shakes head*
no subject
What a fucking exercise in frustration.
You were very brave to try.
The thing that's hysterically funny? In comics, Pepper blows Tony off and he spends most of his time pining over her. *shakes head*
I need more fics like this. Or at least like fics where Pepper has an active romantic life before she ends up with Tony.
Also, this Steve gen fic (http://archiveofourown.org/works/532354) has some great Tony/Pepper moments.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But mostly, I think it's a different strokes thing.
no subject
I can understand that. Personally, I think there are a lot of different, better ways to describe your fic. Added to which, 'pre-slash?' For a het couple? Seriously, wtf?