Friday, July 10th, 2009 08:09 am
If You Are Female......

....and are sexy....

...powerful...

...and are special....

...did something first....

...or did something no one else could do...

...if you are the main character and own that...

...or have a tragic past or romantic entanglements...

...or I don't think your flaws are flawed enough...

...or you aren't hated by everyone....

...or your book has some examples of weak writing...

...or I just don't like you....


YOU'RE A MARY SUE.


To which I say:

FUCK YOU, FANDOM & [livejournal.com profile] fandomsecrets .

Friday, July 10th, 2009 03:33 pm (UTC)
This is why I don't read [livejournal.com profile] fandomsecrets. I'm convinced that half the secrets are trolling in any case. :/
Friday, July 10th, 2009 03:34 pm (UTC)
Smart move.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 04:16 pm (UTC)
Ugh I hate that. I hate it even more that people use the Mary Sue excuse to justify hating female characters...judging by the standards listed above almost EVERY FICTIONAL CHARACTER EVER could be lumped into that category >.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:31 am (UTC)
Exactly.

But if they have a penis, then they're an awesome character.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 04:19 pm (UTC)
Trolling (there are "secrets" posts that admit to it), or just venting... and you know damned well that 3/4ths of their f-list and IM circle have already heard it.

I read it (with a LOT of cynicism) for the occasional "real secret" that actually slips in there, or the occasional smile.

Notes to the knuckleheads:
"I ship it" isn't a secret....
"I judge you" means you haven't noticed your own glass walls yet...
"My fandom is Ossim" is nice, but we've noticed already
"My fandom sucks" is too bad, but we've noticed that too.
"I wish I was him/her" is your secret, but it's a sad one.
"I've told everyone *except you, my best friend*" is passive aggressive bullshit, that makes me damn glad I'll never know you.

Sadly, if they stripped it down to real secrets - the painful, hidden, and sweet things in the postcards from the original concept... you'd have not much material at all.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
Well put! :D
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:39 am (UTC)
Sadly, if they stripped it down to real secrets - the painful, hidden, and sweet things in the postcards from the original concept... you'd have not much material at all.

You certainly wouldn't be able to put out a post every single day.

I read it (with a LOT of cynicism) for the occasional "real secret" that actually slips in there, or the occasional smile.

Same here. And periodically I'll cut myself off and say no more fandom secrets for a couple of weeks.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:48 pm (UTC)
Sounds like you've hit "bullshit threshhold"...

(And yeah, yesterday I was flipping through the post going, "Nope, not secret. Nope, not that one either....")

They've definitely lost the very point of the original Post Secret concept... That there are some things people cannot talk about to the others in their lives for whatever reason... and that secret is eating them inside. It is better off for the holder to surrender that secret to anonymity. True secrets add a psychic weight to the soul and are a huge burden.
Sunday, July 12th, 2009 11:04 pm (UTC)
Sounds like you've hit "bullshit threshhold"...

Oh, so much yes.

And you're right about the weight secrets have. It's a shame so many people don't use it for what it's really intended for.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 04:27 pm (UTC)
Oh jeez, who are they bashing this time? People need to learn the real definition of Mary-Sue and how it applies to hardly anyone.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:45 am (UTC)
A group of fantastic women.

People need to learn the real definition of Mary-Sue and how it applies to hardly anyone.

This. This to infinity.

My list? Bella Swan, Anita Blake, and that idiot hero of the Wheel of Time Series.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 07:03 pm (UTC)
Women can not win. Any flaw they have is worth murdering them for, any virtue they have is intolerable, and any action they take is guaranteed to be wrong.

...I hate fandom, too.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:40 am (UTC)
Also, you know what else makes you a Mary Sue?

Birth control. Yep. God forbid a chick have sex without relying on authorial kindness to avoid getting knocked up.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 07:16 pm (UTC)
Ah, ingrained misogyny. Isn't it angry-making?

A big reason why I avoid F_S these days. I see enough of this shit in real life anyhow.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:45 am (UTC)
Who doesn't love rage in the morning?
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:28 am (UTC)
Delicious Rage Flakes go great with my morning coffee, yes. XD
Friday, July 10th, 2009 07:53 pm (UTC)
Oh, oh, I bet I know the most recent secret that led to this.

Oh, F!S.

Being a Mary Sue is, I think, sort of the fandom equivalent to weight in real life. There isn't a way to win--there's just no way to write a character with a vagina that won't lead to a huge chunk of fandom turning into judgmental asses. I mean, you can't please everyone. But female character you don't like does NOT mean she's a Sue, and real Sue's in published work are pretty rare. I can think of... maybe three or four, and at least one of them is male. Any female lead will have a lot of people complaining that she's too much of a Sue while others are still complaining that she's not strong enough/smart enough/useful enough.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:15 am (UTC)
Word to this.

And it was actually a couple of secrets that prompted this.

can think of... maybe three or four, and at least one of them is male.

Same. If you have a problem with an author's writing actually TALK ABOUT WHAT IS WRONG WITH THEIR WRITING. Don't just slap the label 'mary sue' on a character and move on.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:30 am (UTC)
To a degree, I can appreciate the term. Or I would be able to, rather, if it actually stuck to its meaning. If it always meant a character who's too perfect, and who other characters respond to in an unrealistic way, and who usually has the distinction of being the only competent person in the whole canon, it could be useful. It would be shorter than saying all that, and everyone would know what it meant.

Unfortunately, it's gotten to the point where it doesn't actually mean anything, other than that the character is female. As though men never write total wish fulfillment characters. Hah.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:50 am (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's gotten to the point where it doesn't actually mean anything, other than that the character is female. As though men never write total wish fulfillment characters. Hah.

Yep. That's the whole problem in a nutshell.
(deleted comment)
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 04:30 am (UTC)
I thought Mary Sues were examples of weak writing *confused*

Not really.

Mary Sue usually means either an author insert or an idealized character or both.

Calling a character a Mary Sue usually implies that there is not redeeming quality about the character or the work itself and is often used INSTEAD of saying 'I have a problem with the writing here and here' which is actually something that could lead to a discussion.

Calling Mary Sue often comes across as both misogynistic and inflammatory.

Personally, there are three honest to god Mary Sues who I can't think of as anything else (all from published work). Everything is just weak-to-bad writing, imho.

Just as much as I'm tired of the flipside: people calling me a misogynist because I don't like every single character who just happens to have a vagina.


Yeah, way to betray the sisterhood there, rachel. Don't tell my you also didn't read the memo about hating all male character, too?
(deleted comment)
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:23 am (UTC)
No, no, I'm not saying that Mary Sue's aren't weak writing - but I think writing that has some flaws gets characters slapped with the Mary Sue label too easily, which implies that there is nothing worth-while in the work (or no room to improve) and is often used inaccurately.

The problem is not the term "Mary Sue" or "Gary Stu." It's the people who throw those terms around without understanding what the hell they mean and using them in place of saying "I don't like this character for Shallow, Baseless Reason A.

This. I mean, I would even AGREE with some of the comments about their being problems with how some of the characters are written - but those problems DON'T mean the characters should be written off as Mary Sues.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 09:14 pm (UTC)
I skip over the Mary Sue secrets, and plenty of the other ones too. Half of them really do seem to be all about trolling, which doesn't bother me that much since sometimes the wank is entertaining.

I thought the point of "I ship it" secrets was for posting about ships that you secretly support but are ashamed/nervous about admitting to supporting openly, but it seems like people mostly just post random pairings.

And "Obscure Character XYZ is awesome" is really all about finding like-minded individuals.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:24 am (UTC)
Half of them really do seem to be all about trolling, which doesn't bother me that much since sometimes the wank is entertaining.

It is a good way to get an idea out there if you want to hear what other people think but don't want your name attached to it.

And "Obscure Character XYZ is awesome" is really all about finding like-minded individuals.

*nods* Which actually, seems like a surprisingly positive use of f_s.
Friday, July 10th, 2009 11:06 pm (UTC)
Don't you know? Every female character is a Mary Sue!!

I disregard ANY Mary Sue accusation against a canon character. Mary Sues are in fanfiction. If you are so inclined to bitch and whine about a canon character you deem a Mary Sue, AT LEAST use the shitty term "Canon Sue". I'll still disregard it anyway.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 05:28 am (UTC)
I admit, most of the time I do too. There are a few exceptions.
Saturday, July 11th, 2009 02:59 am (UTC)
Uggh, staying away from the FandomSecrets.

Of course though, a character can be labeled a Mary Sue if they are the exact opposite of some of the things stated on the above list. No winning.

It sucks, really, that some would jump down the throat of a character because she was labeled as such. A lot of the time it's a very narrow minded judgment.

Oh, Fandom, sometimes I hate you just as much as I love you. It makes me want to give it a great big hug with my hands around it's throat.

Saturday, July 11th, 2009 03:41 am (UTC)
Honestly, I hate the term 'Mary Sue' on principal.