You know what I keep hearing? What pisses me off like no other?
The slasher pov that it is impossible to write a male/female relationship that is equal.
Fuck that.
If you want to write about boys sexing each other, fine, but don't flat-out state that it is impossible for a fictionally heterosexual relationship to ever be equal, as well as implying that every single real world straight relationship is inequal to boot.
no subject
...what!?
no subject
IT'S LIKE, PEOPLE! STOP SUCKING SO MUCH!
no subject
no subject
no subject
(...Although, I kind of want to ask those people why they don't do FEMMESLASH too, if the male/female supposed inequality is their hang-up.)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
People put too much stock into gender and sex to begin with, and unfortunately it tends to be particularly bad with yaoi and slash; there's this ridiculous expectation that one partner HAS to be "the woman" of the relationship. I don't know which is more offensive: assuming that there HAS to be a submissive partner in the first place, or that such submission is a "female" quality. :/
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
except when they do that constantly.no subject
But, see, because it's between two men, THEORETICALLY at some point those massive power imbalances could be equaled, which could never, ever happen with a woman in the picture.
no subject
Impossible to write something? Nothing in writing is impossible. The huge abundence of slasher fans should be proof enough for that. Because about a decade (or so, don't quote me =P) ago, they would have been strung up in the street if they even so much as thought about slasher communities. The possibilities of writing, and what people can write and make good, are limitless. No matter race, gender, sexuality, or intended audience.
no subject
What kind of writer are you?
no subject
Ladies, teh cock is not that magical. It's not even strictly necessary for sex. Just because your daddies never loved you because you weren't born with a y-chromosome, doesn't mean that you or the rest of us women are inferior. And, for the love of god, keep your paternal abandonment issues out of my fandom.
no subject
no subject
I have no idea what the connection is between not having a healthy relationship with your father and a mystification with men = depletion of personal female value.
Maybe the reason the penis is so mysterious is because it's an image that girls are sequestered from on cultural reflex?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Even once you take the slash element out of it, it's something that's still very prevalent in YA culture. That doesn't make it any less disturbing, but I think it provides context.
no subject
no subject
http://riesetheseries.com/html/index.html
no subject
no subject
People should stop trying to devalue the thing they don't like just to justify what they do like. I can say,
"Football is fucking boring as shit and the people who play it aren't true athletes, just a bunch of money-hogs who dope up and for what? Bad rerun tv. Now, ice hockey...ice hockey is AWESOME and you can see how hard it is, how much skill that it takes. That's a much better game."
Except saying that doesn't make me a thoughtful analyst. It makes
me an asshole.
I feel this way about het v. slash discussions. It's all whiny hypocrisy and blindness. About the only thing I don't feel guilty about looking down my nose at is RPF. I honestly think that is demented and no long, eloquent essays are ever going to cure me of the gut reaction that screams out against it. If people who write slash feel the way about het that I feel about RPF, then I guess I can understand why they feel a need to describe how twisted it is. Or vice versa with slash. But even so...I may think RPF is messed up b.s., but I'm not going to write a long essay about why it's inferior and less complex emotionally and then make long posts about it. I'm content to let them do their thing, I just won't read it. This is fandom! Who even cares if someone else doesn't like what you like. Another someone always does.
no subject
No, it doesn't make you an asshole. You speak truth. *is mad hockey fan*
(no subject)
no subject
I must admit, watching people try to justify their ingrained misogyny is pretty entertaining. In that 'my God you make me want to rip my hair out by the roots' kind of way.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Anyway, on topic.
Here's the really sad, stupid thing: I bet if you were to ask those same slasher fans if they assigned their characters seme and uke roles in the story, most of them would probably say yes.
And THAT, my friends, is irony because seme/uke doesn't mean dom/sub. The concept translates more closely as male/FEMALE.
Which means that even though they're writing about a homosexual relationship because they believe it's more functional/equal than a heterosexual one, THEY ARE STILL TECHNICALLY WRITING A RELATIONSHIP BASED OFF OF HETEROSEXUAL DYNAMICS.***
This is exactly why so many bandwagon yaoi fans drive me up the fucking wall. They don't KNOW the history behind why yaoi was created or what it's really about. All they know is *squee* they can put to hot men together in bed.
As you know, I like my yaoi as much as the next slash fan girl, and it bothers me to no end that people don't understand WHAT it is that they're sooooo into. They keep forgetting that Japanese culture has NOT always been comparable to Western and that homosexuality has been more acceptable than a woman stepping outside her traditional role. Yaoi was used as a way for women to EXPRESS themselves as equals through art.
Okay, I'm stopping here for now. I'm tired and I've probably garbled something somewhere. Expect to see this revised/revisited in the near future.
***ETA: This is based off of traditional Japanese male/female dynamics and is not a reflection of my own personal views on said dynamics.
no subject
And THAT, my friends, is irony because seme/uke doesn't mean dom/sub. The concept translates more closely as male/FEMALE.
Now THAT is interesting. I've always avoided seme/uke when I write yaoi, but I always figured it translated to 'top' and 'bottom' or something similar.
THEY ARE STILL TECHNICALLY WRITING A RELATIONSHIP BASED OFF OF HETEROSEXUAL DYNAMICS.
And that is just wonderfully ironic given the topic of this post...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*groan* It's things like this that make me genuinely embarrassed to be a slash fan. BRB, paying a visit to the Utena and Iron Man fandoms to cleanse my soul.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
this. so very much.
no subject
And impying that one or the other always makes one member of the partnership unequal is such crap that I want to check this person's head for brain damage. *GROWLS*
I know! I'm not, do you not realize what you're implying and how insulting that is?
no subject
In fact, it implies that these girls feel too inferior to even look at themselves straight. I mean...aren't they girls themselves? DDDX
no subject